← Cancer trial database
Trial result
Colorectal cancer

AtezoTRIBE: ctDNA (ctF) non-responders show larger PFS gain with PD-L1 atezolizumab add-on in 1L mCRC

Trial ID
NCT03721653 on ClinicalTrials.gov
Cancer type
Colorectal Cancer
Published in
New in Oncology - June 25, 2026

In the Phase 2 AtezoTRIBE trial (NCT03721653), adding the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to first-line FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer was evaluated here with a translational liquid-biopsy analysis using the Tempus xF 105-gene cfDNA assay to measure plasma TMB (pTMB; high ≥26 mut/Mb) and circulating tumor fraction (ctF) dynamics from baseline (T0) to end of induction (T1). Baseline pTMB was evaluable in 123/155 (79%), with 16% pTMB-high (20/123); pTMB-high was prognostic for longer PFS (HR 0.69; 90%CI 0.43–1.10; p=0.095) but not predictive for atezolizumab benefit (treatment interaction p=0.871)—consistent with the broader reality that pMMR/MSS mCRC rarely benefits meaningfully from ICIs outside niche biomarker-defined pockets. Among patients with paired ctF (n=89), “molecular responders” (top 30% relative ctF reduction/clearance) were common (71%; 63/89), yet the larger relative benefit from adding atezolizumab appeared in ctF non-responders (HR 0.33; 90%CI 0.16–0.69) vs molecular responders (HR 0.76; 90%CI 0.03–3.95), with an interaction signal using the authors’ pre-specified lenient threshold (p_int=0.132; sensitivity analysis p_int=0.108). For context, first-line FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab already delivers median PFS ~12.3 months in TRIBE vs ~9.7 months with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab (HR 0.77), so any incremental ICI effect needs to be clearly distinguishable from chemotherapy-driven ctDNA clearance.

Take home

If validated, ctF “lack of early molecular response” could become a practical enrichment tool—paradoxically flagging the patients least helped by induction chemo as the ones most likely to gain from adding atezolizumab—though the interaction is modest by conventional stats and the MR subgroup’s CI is so wide that this could still be a sample-size/selection artifact rather than true immune-sensitization.

Source: Read the original publication

More in colorectal cancer

See all entries in colorectal cancer →