← Cancer trial database
Trial result
Colorectal cancer

Doublet long-course TNT (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) improves DFS and pCR vs standard nCRT in high-risk LARC

Trial ID
NCT03177382 on ClinicalTrials.gov
Cancer type
Rectal Cancer
Published in
New in Oncology - Aug 13, 2026

Doublet-LC TNT integrates long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) with uninterrupted doublet chemotherapy (capecitabine + oxaliplatin; induction → concurrent → consolidation) before surgery, versus conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine + LCRT) followed by surgery and adjuvant chemo in a multicenter Phase III trial (TNTCRT; NCT03177382) in stage II/III high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (n=458). At median 51 months’ follow-up, 3-year DFS was 74.8% vs 66.0% (HR 0.674; p=0.016) and 3-year metastasis-free survival was 77.7% vs 67.6% (HR 0.655), with pCR 26.37% vs 9.80% (p<0.001) and similarly low locoregional failure (~6% both arms); for context, modern TNT benchmarks like RAPIDO improved disease-related treatment failure at 3 years (23.7% vs 30.4%) with pCR ~28% (vs ~14%) but raised concerns about higher locoregional recurrence on longer follow-up, while PRODIGE 23 also improved DFS/MFS vs standard sequencing. Grade ≥3 neoadjuvant AEs were higher with doublet-LC TNT (27.59% vs 8.56%), but grade ≥3 toxicity across the full course (28.02% vs 24.32%) and major postoperative complications (3.98% vs 2.94%) were comparable.

Take home

If reproducible across practice settings, this “keep the doublet going through LCRT” approach looks like a credible, high-compliance way to push down distant relapse risk in the highest-risk LARC group—though the key differentiation versus other TNT standards (e.g., RAPIDO- or PRODIGE 23–style programs) will hinge on longer-term local control, organ preservation strategy integration, and how tolerability plays out outside trials.

Source: Read the original publication

More in colorectal cancer

See all entries in colorectal cancer →