← Cancer trial database
Trial result
Ovarian cancer

SBS5 (clock-like) mutational signature flags longer PFS after cisplatin HIPEC in EOC

Trial ID
NCT01970722 on ClinicalTrials.gov
Cancer type
Ovarian, Fallopian, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Published in
New in Oncology - June 25, 2026

In a single-center WES biomarker analysis of patients with primary or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with cisplatin HIPEC during optimal cytoreductive surgery (cisplatin 75mg/m², 60 min, 42°C; NCT01970722), SBS5 (unknown etiology; “clock-like”) was enriched in “good responders” defined by PFS ≥18 months (primary) or ≥12 months (recurrent) vs “poor responders” (n=36 tumors; 21 primary/15 recurrent; p=0.017). Clinically, good responders had longer OS vs poor responders (NR vs NR; p=0.02), but this is a retrospective, threshold-defined endpoint rather than randomized HIPEC vs no-HIPEC predictive evidence; in first-line interval-debulking HIPEC trials, median PFS benchmarks have typically been in the mid–teens months range (e.g., ~14 months in the van Driel setting), so the “good responder” cutoffs are directionally consistent with clinically meaningful separation rather than a marginal tweak. Recurrence pattern signal: peritoneal-only recurrence (64%) showed higher SBS15 (MMR-associated) burden than extraperitoneal recurrence (36%) (p=0.048), while median PFS was similar by recurrence site (15.3 vs 14.3 months), suggesting SBS15 may be more about metastatic pattern than overall disease control in this dataset.

Take home

If validated, SBS5/SBS15 could become practical “who benefits/where will it fail” genomic context for HIPEC—but right now the study is small, non-randomized, and uses post-hoc PFS cutoffs, so it’s best viewed as a hypothesis-generating biomarker signal rather than a patient-selection tool.

Source: Read the original publication

More in ovarian cancer

See all entries in ovarian cancer →