Brenetafusp (PRAME×CD3 ImmTAC) shows 17% ORR at 160µg in late-line melanoma, with mostly low-grade CRS and no irAE recurrence
- Trial ID
- NCT04262466 on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Cancer type
- Melanoma
- Published in
- New in Oncology - June 25, 2026
Brenetafusp (IMC-F106C) is a PRAME-targeted ImmTAC bispecific (PRAME×CD3) designed to redirect polyclonal T cells into PRAME-expressing tumors; in this Phase 1 study (NCT04262466), HLA-A*02:01+ advanced melanoma patients who had exhausted standard options (median 2.5 prior lines; 100% prior anti–PD-1; 30% PD-1 refractory; 68% stage IVc/IVd) received weekly IV brenetafusp monotherapy across doses including 40µg (n=16) and 160µg (n=24), plus a small combination cohort of brenetafusp 160µg weekly + pembrolizumab 400mg Q6W (n=10). In the full monotherapy melanoma set (n=66), DCR was 52% with ORR 12%, 6-month OS 83%, and ctDNA molecular response 38% (ctDNA-evaluable n=50); by dose, 160µg trended higher than 40µg for DCR (67% vs 56%), ORR (17% vs 6%), and ctDNA response (33% vs 20%) despite baseline imbalances favoring the 40µg cohort, while PD-1–refractory patients still showed ORR 10% and ctDNA response 53% (ctDNA-evaluable n=15). Safety was characterized by Grade 1/2 CRS (56% at 40µg; 42% at 160µg) and rash (44% vs 42%), with Grade 3/4 AEs more frequent at 160µg (54% vs 25%) mainly due to transient lymphocyte decreases; notably, among 10 patients with prior ICI Grade 3/4 irAEs, none recurred, and the combo cohort showed DCR 70% and ORR 20% with no new signals—an AE profile that appears qualitatively different from CTLA-4–based salvage strategies where ≥Grade 3 toxicity is often a central limitation. For efficacy context post–anti–PD-1, published salvage outcomes with ipilimumab-based approaches are typically in the ~10–25% ORR range but with substantial ≥Grade 3 irAEs (often ~30%+; higher in many series), so a 17% ORR signal at 160µg lands “in-family” on response while potentially differentiating on irAE phenotype (needs confirmation in larger, controlled data).
Take home
If the Phase 3 PRISM-MEL strategy (brenetafusp+nivolumab vs standard nivolumab regimens) reproduces these response/ctDNA signals without importing CTLA-4–like irAEs, this could become a genuinely patient-friendly way to re-introduce T-cell killing in PD-1–experienced melanoma—but the current dataset is small, non-randomized, and dose cohorts weren’t prognostically balanced, so the “160µg is better” story still needs clean confirmatory evidence.
Source: Read the original publication
More in melanoma
-
New trial · Oct 22, 2026 · NCT07869381
Randomized trial compares comprehensive margin assessment with standard pathology after melanoma surgery -
New trial · Oct 15, 2026 · NCT07830225
Phase 2 pilot uses ctDNA to guide checkpoint-inhibitor discontinuation in advanced melanoma with disease control -
Trial result · Oct 8, 2026 · NCT06566092
Lifileucel produces confirmed responses in 2 of 3 treated adolescents with ICI-refractory metastatic melanoma -
New trial · Oct 8, 2026 · NCT07804186
Phase 3 darovasertib PKC inhibitor plus crizotinib c-MET/ALK inhibitor in adjuvant uveal melanoma -
New trial · Oct 8, 2026 · NCT07815574
Phase 3 iSCIB1+ gp100/TRP-2 DNA vaccine adds melanoma antigen targeting to PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade.
