← Cancer trial database
Trial result
Prostate cancer

Enzalutamide-era mCRPC: ctDNA AR enhancer/AR copy gains sharpen rPFS risk stratification (Alliance A031201)

Trial ID
NCT01949337 on ClinicalTrials.gov
Cancer type
Prostate Cancer
Published in
New in Oncology - June 25, 2026

A031201 randomized chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients to the androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitor enzalutamide ± abiraterone acetate/prednisone (n=776 with baseline ctDNA profiled by the AR-ctDETECT assay; NCT01949337), and this analysis built a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) clinical-genetic (CG) prognostic model for radiographic PFS (rPFS). AR enhancer gain and AR gain were among the strongest adverse markers (median rPFS 13.7 vs 27.3 months and 13.5 vs 27.0 months with vs without the alteration, respectively); the random survival forest model selected gains (AR, AR enhancer, MYC, CCND1, FOXA1) and losses (PTEN, TP53, LRP1B) plus clinical labs (hemoglobin, PSA, alkaline phosphatase), improving discrimination vs a clinical-only model (mean itAUC 0.73 vs 0.66; NRI 0.30 at 22 months). The model stratified patients into low/intermediate/poor risk with median rPFS 39.2/25.2/12.8 months (HR low vs poor 0.25; intermediate vs poor 0.46); as a benchmark, first-line ARSI-era trials report rPFS on the order of ~20 months for enzalutamide vs placebo in PREVAIL and ~16.5 months for abiraterone in COU‑AA‑302 (investigator assessment), underscoring how much baseline biology can swing outcomes even within “ARSI-treated” mCRPC populations.

Take home

If externally validated, this kind of ctDNA-first risk model could become the practical way to (1) enrich intensification trials for the ~13‑month poor-risk biology (AR enhancer/MYC/PTEN/TP53 patterns) and (2) spare clearly low-risk patients (median rPFS ~39 months here) from “more drugs up front” strategies that A031201 itself did not show to materially improve outcomes over enzalutamide alone.

Source: Read the original publication

More in prostate cancer

See all entries in prostate cancer →