Daratumumab (CD38 mAb) boosts depth of response across age/frailty in TIE NDMM (MAIA/CEPHEUS)
- Cancer type
- Multiple Myeloma
- Published in
- DOUBLE ISSUE: New in Oncology - July 8, 2026
Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody added to immunomodulatory backbone Rd (MAIA; DRd vs Rd; n=368 vs 369) or to proteasome-inhibitor triplet VRd (CEPHEUS; DVRd vs VRd; n=144 vs 145) in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, with subgrouping by age (<70, 70–<75, ≥75y) and IFM simplified frailty (0–1 non-frail; ≥2 frail) at median follow-up 64.5mo (MAIA) and 76.0mo (CEPHEUS). Across all age strata, PFS favored dara-based therapy (MAIA HR 0.35 <70y; 0.64 age 70–<75; 0.59 ≥75; CEPHEUS HR 0.60 <70; 0.60 age 70–<75; 0.46 ≥75) with deeper responses: ≥CR improved vs control (e.g., MAIA <70y 56.4% vs 31.2%; ≥75y 44.4% vs 28.6; CEPHEUS <70y 85.7% vs 68.6%; ≥75y 80.5% vs 44.4) alongside higher MRD negativity at 10^-5 with ≥CR and higher sustained MRD negativity (≥12±1mo apart) (e.g., frail MAIA sustained MRD neg 15.7% vs 4.1; frail CEPHEUS 39.6% vs 17.1). Safety was reported as consistent with known profiles and generally comparable across arms/subgroups, but the abstract does not provide grade ≥3 AE rates, discontinuations, or infection/cytopenia detail—important given older/frail enrichment (in MAIA, 46% frail; in CEPHEUS TIE, 29% frail).
Take home
If the AE tables hold up, these data argue you don’t have to “de-escalate” just because a TIE NDMM patient is ≥75 or frail—dara-containing Rd/VRd appears to preserve the PFS advantage and markedly increases MRD-negative (and sustained MRD-negative) remissions in precisely the patients we worry will tolerate intensification least.
Source: Read the original publication
More in multiple myeloma
-
Trial result · Oct 22, 2026 · NCT04184050
MK-4002 (BCMA×CD3 trispecific T-cell engager) drives 63% ORR at 12 mg in heavily pretreated RRMM -
Trial result · Oct 15, 2026 · NCT04557150
Forimtamig (GPRC5D×CD3 2:1 bispecific) posts 72% ORR at optimized SC dosing—but toxicity caps escalation in RRMM -
New trial · Oct 15, 2026 · NCT06948084
Phase 2 daratumumab plus teclistamab is compared with DPd or DKd in high-risk, second-line multiple myeloma -
Trial result · Oct 1, 2026 · NCT03301220
Daratumumab (anti-CD38) cuts progression risk in Japanese high-risk SMM vs monitoring (AQUILA) -
Trial result · Sep 24, 2026 · NCT05469893
Teclistamab (BCMAxCD3 bispecific) drives 78% CR and 92% 2-year PFS in high-risk smoldering myeloma
